Foreign body ingestion is a common presentation to acute care that can lead to significant morbidity or mortality without appropriate and timely management. Bottlecaps are small and sharp, and though uncommon world-wide as a cause of foreign body ingestion, threaten complications of ulceration and perforation. The burden of alcohol excess and pattern of drinking in Canterbury makes this presentation far from novel. We present three cases of bottle cap ingestion to highlight their risk and endoscopic management approaches.
Full article available to subscribers
Foreign body ingestion is a common presentation to acute care that can lead to significant morbidity or mortality without appropriate and timely management. Bottlecaps are small and sharp, and though uncommon world-wide as a cause of foreign body ingestion, threaten complications of ulceration and perforation. The burden of alcohol excess and pattern of drinking in Canterbury makes this presentation far from novel. We present three cases of bottle cap ingestion to highlight their risk and endoscopic management approaches.
View Table 1, Figure 1.
Canterbury, among other regions in New Zealand, suffers the plight of a binge-drinking culture. Moreover, Christchurch has the second highest weekly alcohol intake per week by region.1 The adverse consequences are realised at the hospital front door, with 4–5% of emergency department presentations relating to alcohol consumption. Inadvertent ingestion and impaction of bottle caps is rare as a phenomenon but can be life threatening owing to their sharp edges.1,2 A case series in a German university town reported 14 cases over a 10-year span, and a total of only 20 cases have entered the literature since 1988.2,3 We describe three cases presenting to Christchurch Hospital within 3 months.
The key points upon review of our three patients include that all cases involved a history of inebriation and amnesia to ingestion of the foreign body. It is suspected that ingestion took place during the rapid consumption of excess amounts of alcohol, with or without the soporific, anaesthetic effect of antecedent inebriation. The age group was perhaps older than the archetypal student cohort (average age of 23.0 +/4.2 with a range of 18.3–35.6 in the German cohort of 14 patients over 9 years).3 This complication took place in the absence of underlying gastro-oesophageal disease. The duration of hospitalisation and complication rates are low, reflecting the short latency to presentation, and a healthier patient cohort.
Interestingly, our three cases follow the trend of published cases in that this is a presentation exclusively of males.2
Endoscopic retrieval of the foreign body can be difficult. Table 1 demonstrates the improvised methods of using an extraction hood, a braided snare with heat and a Roth Net as effective endoscopic strategies. In two of the three cases, initial attempt with a Roth Net was ineffective. In the last case, a repeat procedure was required due to food debris within the stomach. Specific guidance on removal of foreign bodies is limited.4,5 The most common approach from a case series was by grasping forceps in 56%, and mesh loop in 22.2%.2
Guidelines support early imaging for radiopaque objects to evaluate the presence, location and character of options, and to evaluate for signs of perforation.4,5
The World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines support emergent (within 2 hours, 6 hours at the latest) endoscopy for the removal of sharp pointed objects causing complete obstruction, and endoscopy within <24 hours for incomplete obstruction due to the threat of deep and penetrating complications. While the studied patients have largely had good outcomes, the tendency to embed within the wall of the viscus demands expedient work-up and management.5
Though rare as presentations, conceivable measures that may abrogate its risk include advocating for consumption of cold beer where a burgeoning “brain freeze” might slow the rate of consumption, encouraging more expensive beers as a financial disincentive, drinking alternative beverages including champagne (where there remains no case reports of oesophageal obstruction) or wine and, at the heart of the issue, addressing the hitherto unshiftable entity of hazardous beer drinking.2,3,6
An impacted bottle cap is a rare but serious complication of acute and excessive alcohol intake, with the burden of this entity resting upon adult males. The nature of this foreign body obliges clinical and radiological investigation for complications prior to proceeding to emergent endoscopic extraction. Viable endoscopic techniques for extraction include the use of a Roth Net, extraction hood and braided snare with heat.
Asim Abdulhamid: Department of Gastroenterology, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury.
Heidi Yi-han Su: Department of Gastroenterology, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury.
Steven Leslie Ding: Department of Gastroenterology, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury.
Asim Abdulhamid: Department of Gastroenterology, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury.
None.
1) Smitheram K. Alcohol related harm [Internet]. Canterbury District Health Board; 2022 May 24 [cited 2023 Nov 11]. Available from: https://www.cdhb.health.nz/about-us/document-library/cdhb-10861-alcohol-related-harm/
2) Prakash K, Rosario PG, Kim S. Esophageal obstruction from a beer-bottle cap. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(2):121-2. doi: 10.1056/nejm198907133210215.
3) Bertlich M, Ihler F, Sommerlath Sohns JM, et al. From the Bottlecap to the Bottleneck: Frequent Esophageal Impaction of Bottlecaps Among Young Males in a Small University Town. Dysphagia. 2022 Feb;37(1):192-197. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10263-x.
4) Fung BM, Sweetser S, Wong Kee Song LM, Tabibian JH. Foreign object ingestion and esophageal food impaction: An update and review on endoscopic management. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar 16;11(3):174-192. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i3.174.
5) Chirica M, Kelly MD, Siboni S, et al. Esophageal emergencies: WSES guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2019 May 31;14:26. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0245-2.
6) Douglas RJ. Champagne: the safer choice for celebrations. BMJ. 2007 Dec 22;335(7633):1281. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39419.449942.AD.
Sign in to view your account and access
the latest publications by the NZMJ.
Don't have an account?
Let's get started with creating an account.
Already have an account?
Become a member to enjoy unlimited digital access and support the ongoing publication of the New Zealand Medical Journal.
The New Zealand Medical Journal is fully available to individual subscribers and does not incur a subscription fee. This applies to both New Zealand and international subscribers. Institutions are encouraged to subscribe. The value of institutional subscriptions is essential to the NZMJ, as supporting a reputable medical journal demonstrates an institution’s commitment to academic excellence and professional development. By continuing to pay for a subscription, institutions signal their support for valuable medical research and contribute to the journal's continued success.
Please email us at nzmj@pmagroup.co.nz