We report the successful implementation of a robotic oesophago-gastric surgery programme at our tertiary centre and describe New Zealand’s first robotic-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy (RAMIO).
Full article available to subscribers
We report the successful implementation of a robotic oesophago-gastric surgery programme at our tertiary centre and describe New Zealand’s first robotic-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy (RAMIO). RAMIO combines the benefits of minimally invasive surgery with enhanced precision and surgeon ergonomics. This is particularly relevant in oesophago-gastric surgery, where complex anatomy and challenging access can be addressed using robotic surgery’s enhanced three-dimensional visualisation and highly articulating instruments, resulting in improved surgeon ergonomics and control.1 This development was built on a minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) programme established by the senior author in the preceding year.
A 74-year-old man with locally advanced distal oesophageal adenocarcinoma underwent RAMIO following four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The abdominal phase was performed robotically and the thoracic phase thoracoscopically. Total theatre time was 515 minutes. Post-operatively, he required a 4-day ICU stay and developed transient delirium and rapid atrial fibrillation, with a negative septic workup. There was no conduit necrosis or anastomotic leak. Histopathology confirmed residual adenocarcinoma with clear resection margins and 4/19 positive lymph nodes (ypT2N2). All oncological benchmarking parameters were achieved. The patient was discharged on post-operative day 7 and referred for adjuvant chemotherapy.
New Zealand’s first RAMIO was led by the senior author and built on an established minimally invasive oesophagectomy programme. The implementation of RAMIO represents a milestone in the evolution of minimally advanced surgery. Adoption necessitates a long-term vision and co-ordinated departmental collaboration with the aim to develop industry-leading service provision. Successful introduction needs to be underpinned by meticulous planning, interdisciplinary collaboration and strict protocolised driven peri-operative care. Patient safety is always the number one priority, and this is ensured by continuous monitoring of quality indicators including failure-to-rescue.2 Implementation of a robotic programme must be done gradually, with careful audit of key outcomes to ensure oncological standards are maintained.3
Compared with conventional laparoscopy, there is promising evidence that RAMIO is associated with a lower incidence of post-operative complications and a trend toward higher lymph node yield. Oncological outcomes appear equivalent; however, long-term survival data remain under investigation.4–6 Current evidence suggests greater precision during lymphadenectomy and the potential for improved resection margins in anatomically complex or advanced cases.7,8 Extended or high mediastinal lymphadenectomy is enhanced by superior articulation and three-dimensional visualisation. In addition, there are ergonomic and exposure benefits, especially in patients with very high BMI, allowing stable visualisation and improved dissection.7 Adoption of RAMIO not only has pragmatic benefits leading to better patient outcomes and surgeon experience, but also enhances the global recognition and reputation of the institution, thereby attracting leaders in minimally invasive surgery.6
This report aims to document the first RAMIO performed within New Zealand’s public health system and to outline how it can be safely adopted locally. The case involved a publicly funded patient and was performed by the senior author, who has formal oesophago-gastric and robotic training and certification. The senior author had successfully implemented a formal MIO programme at the institution and demonstrated its safety and feasibility prior to progressing to a robot-assisted oesophagectomy. Given that this was the first case nationally, a stepwise introduction was undertaken to ensure safe implementation. This began with the demonstration of good MIO outcomes (laparoscopic abdominal and thoracoscopic chest phases), followed by the gradual introduction of the robotic phase in the abdominal component while maintaining a thoracoscopic chest phase. We highlight the prerequisites for wider adoption in New Zealand, including structured training and proctoring, as well as institutional support. While cost savings are unlikely in the current health environment, RAMIO may offer clinical value through more precise lymphadenectomy, improved access in complex cases and technical advantages in high-BMI patients.5,7 These considerations provide a feasible pathway for replication in other centres with appropriate expertise.
James Z Jin, MBChB, PhD: Department of General Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waitematā.
Yazmin Johari, MBBS, FRACS: Department of General Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waitematā.
Michael Rodgers, MBChB, FRACS: Department of General Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waitematā.
Suheelan Kulasegaran, MBChB, FRACS: Department of General Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waitematā.
Suheelan Kulasegaran, MBChB, FRACS: Department of General Surgery, North Shore Hospital, 124 Shakespeare Rd, Auckland 0620, New Zealand.
Nil.
1) Kooij CD, de Jongh C, Kingma BF, et al. The Current State of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Outcomes from the Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA) Esophageal Registry. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):823-833. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16364-9.
2) Kulasegaran S, Woodhouse B, Wang Y, et al. Quality performance indicators for oesophageal and gastric cancer: ANZ expert Delphi consensus. ANZ J Surg. 2024 Oct;94(10):1732-1737. doi: 10.1111/ans.19173.
3) Kulasegaran S, Wang Y, Woodhouse B, et al. Quality Performance Indicators for the Surgical Management of Oesophageal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. World J Surg. 2023 Dec;47(12):3262-3269. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07216-w.
4) Mederos MA, de Virgilio MJ, Shenoy R, et al. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2129228. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29228.
5) Turner KM, Delman AM, Johnson K, et al. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort. J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.09.029.
6) Zhang Y, Dong D, Cao Y, et al. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):39-50. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005782.
7) Scheese D, Ramamoorthy BU, Bane B, et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy—technical considerations and outcomes. Annals of Esophagus. 2024;7(20). doi: 10.21037/aoe-24-18
8) Perry R, Barbosa JP, Perry I, Barbosa J. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients. J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 16;18(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01880-3.
Sign in to view your account and access
the latest publications by the NZMJ.
Don't have an account?
Let's get started with creating an account.
Already have an account?
Become a member to enjoy unlimited digital access and support the ongoing publication of the New Zealand Medical Journal.
The New Zealand Medical Journal is fully available to individual subscribers and does not incur a subscription fee. This applies to both New Zealand and international subscribers. Institutions are encouraged to subscribe. The value of institutional subscriptions is essential to the NZMJ, as supporting a reputable medical journal demonstrates an institution’s commitment to academic excellence and professional development. By continuing to pay for a subscription, institutions signal their support for valuable medical research and contribute to the journal's continued success.
Please email us at nzmj@pmagroup.co.nz