New Zealand continues to experience some of the highest incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide, with more than 3,500 new diagnoses and 1,200 CRC-related deaths reported in 2020. Of increasing concern is the steady rise in early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as CRC diagnosed before the age of 50.
Full article available to subscribers
New Zealand continues to experience some of the highest incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide, with more than 3,500 new diagnoses and 1,200 CRC-related deaths reported in 2020.1 Of increasing concern is the steady rise in early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as CRC diagnosed before the age of 50. EOCRC incidence in New Zealand is increasing by approximately 26% per decade, with an even sharper rise of 36% per decade among Māori.1 Most of these cancers are sporadic and increasingly recognised as associated with extrinsic (and therefore modifiable) risk factors.2
It has been 10 years since David Wishart proposed a compelling argument for a metabolic, rather than purely genetic, basis for the global increase in cancer, citing alterations in metabolic pathways as key drivers of carcinogenesis.3 The finding that metabolic profiling of biopsied CRC tumours and matched normal tissue can discriminate normal from malignant samples, as well as colon from rectal cancers, supports this hypothesis.4 To date, a range of relevant metabolites have been identified,5,6 including urinary glucose levels.7 This gains significance given there is increasing evidence that the metabolic dysregulation associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may also contribute to the pathogenesis of EOCRC.8
Sugar, a term commonly used to describe simple carbohydrates such as glucose, fructose and galactose, is normally metabolised in the small intestine and absorbed into the bloodstream, resulting in an insulin response that promotes cellular uptake of glucose.9 Elevated fasting glucose levels and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), markers of acute and chronic dysglycemia respectively, are reported in CRC patients.10 Moreover, elevated HbA1c levels in non-diabetic adults, especially those aged 40–50 years, appear to support a link between excessive dietary sugar intake and increased risk of colon carcinogenesis.11 Collectively, these studies reinforce the idea that lifestyle changes reflected in altered metabolic profiles are likely contributing to rising CRC risk in younger populations,2 particularly with regards sugar consumption.
In the past century, sugar intake has tripled worldwide, largely driven by the introduction of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs).12 SSB consumption among young people has risen steadily since the 1980s.13 Despite the World Health Organization (WHO) advising that added sugars should comprise no more than 10% of daily caloric intake (approximately 50–60 grams per day),14 many SSBs (including fruit drinks, energy drinks, sports drinks and carbonated beverages) contain enough glucose, fructose and sucrose to exceed this limit within a single serving.15 As a result, sugar intake among young people who reportedly consume SSBs on a regular basis often frequently surpass these recommended guidelines. This gains significance with evidence that regular consumption of SSBs (≥2 servings per day) is associated with an increased risk of EOCRC by as much as 32%.16
Mechanistically, the link between excess dietary sugar and CRC risk relates to cancer-specific pathways involving energy metabolism, lipid metabolism, inflammation and immune regulation.17 Notably, the association appears strongest for cancers of the colon10 and, more specifically, the proximal colon,18 supporting the hypothesis that unabsorbed sugars exceeding the small intestine’s absorptive capacity can transit into the proximal colon.19 Colonocytes that line the epithelial barrier are normally shielded from the gut microbiota by a constitutively expressed inner mucus layer.20 While glucose intake can alter the composition of the gut microbiota,21 emerging evidence suggests that dysglycemia-induced thinning or dysfunction of the mucus barrier (occurring even in the absence of dysbiosis) may compromise epithelial protection,22,23 increasing the risk of carcinogenesis.
In New Zealand, SSBs are the leading contributor of added sugar among both children and adults24 and therefore likely play a significant role in childhood and adolescent obesity, particularly among Māori.25 Being overweight or obese, especially during childhood, is a recognised risk factor for future CRC.25–27 Approximately one in eight New Zealand children is now obese, helping to explain the persistent rise in EOCRC incidence.28 Childhood obesity is also strongly associated with the development of metabolic disorders such as dysglycemia, impaired glucose tolerance and T2DM later in life.28 However, while high SSB intake clearly promotes weight gain,29 animal studies show that high-glucose or high-fructose diets can induce adverse changes in the colonic microenvironment even in the absence of weight gain.21 Consistent with this, increased SSB consumption does not always correlate with higher body fat percentages in young New Zealanders.14
The identification of glucose-related metabolic biomarkers offers a promising avenue for early risk assessment in primary care settings. Simple, low-cost measurements such as glucose or HbA1c levels could help general practitioners identify patients at elevated metabolic risk long before symptoms arise, potentially facilitating earlier diagnostic evaluation with faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and, when indicated, colonoscopy. Given that childhood obesity and metabolic disorders frequently persist into adulthood, intervention efforts must begin early and be culturally responsive, particularly for Māori communities who bear a disproportionate burden of EOCRC.
In summary, the growing body of evidence linking metabolic dysregulation, excessive dietary sugar intake and EOCRC underscores an important and potentially preventable public health challenge for New Zealand. The association between SSB consumption and increased CRC risk, particularly among young individuals, reflects broader shifts in diet, metabolic health and lifestyle over recent decades. Importantly, the mechanistic pathways involved, including dysglycemia-related impairment of the proximal colonic environment and disruption of the protective barriers, provide biologically plausible foundations for this relationship.
As evidence continues to accumulate, the need for public health intervention becomes increasingly clear. Ultimately, reducing SSB consumption, one of the most modifiable contributors to excessive dietary sugar intake, represents an achievable and impactful strategy to mitigate the rising burden of EOCRC and metabolic disease in young New Zealanders.
New Zealand’s rising rates of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), particularly among Māori, underscore the growing concern about the role of metabolic dysregulation in disease development. There is increasing evidence suggesting that metabolic dysregulation associated with excessive dietary sugar intake may play a central role in colorectal carcinogenesis. Childhood obesity, impaired glucose metabolism and high consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are prevalent among New Zealand youth, suggesting early metabolic dysfunction may precede and contribute to EOCRC risk. Given this, routinely measured metabolic biomarkers, including glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), may offer early risk stratification within primary care settings. This viewpoint also considers whether reductions in SSB consumption could represent a simple and potentially impactful strategy to reduce long-term metabolic disease burden and, consequently, the incidence of EOCRC.
Krista L Dawson: Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Oliver Waddell: Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Frank Frizelle, FRACS: Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Jacqueline I Keenan: Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Krista L Dawson: Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago Christchurch, 2 Riccarton Avenue, 8011 Christchurch, Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Frank Frizelle is the Editor in Chief of the New Zealand Medical Journal.
1) Waddell O, Pearson J, McCombie A, et al. The incidence of early onset colorectal cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: 2000-2020. BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12122-y.
2) Keenan J, Aitchison A, Frizelle F. Are young people eating their way to bowel cancer? N Z Med J. 2017 Aug 11;130(1460):90-92.
3) Wishart DS. Is Cancer a Genetic Disease or a Metabolic Disease? EBioMedicine. 2015 May 23;2(6):478-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.05.022.
4) Chan EC, Koh PK, Mal M, et al. Metabolic profiling of human colorectal cancer using high-resolution magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (HR-MAS NMR) spectroscopy and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS). J Proteome Res. 2009 Jan;8(1):352-61. doi: 10.1021/pr8006232.
5) Farshidfar F, Weljie AM, Kopciuk KA, et al. A validated metabolomic signature for colorectal cancer: exploration of the clinical value of metabolomics. Br J Cancer. 2016 Sep 27;115(7):848-57. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.243.
6) Uchiyama K, Yagi N, Mizushima K, et al. Serum metabolomics analysis for early detection of colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;52(6):677-694. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1261-6.
7) Mallafré-Muro C, Llambrich M, Cumeras R, et al. Comprehensive Volatilome and Metabolome Signatures of Colorectal Cancer in Urine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 21;13(11):2534. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112534.
8) Du M, Drew DA, Goncalves MD, et al. Early-onset colorectal cancer as an emerging disease of metabolic dysregulation. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2025 Nov;21(11):686-702. doi: 10.1038/s41574-025-01159-z.
9) Wright EM, Martín MG, Turk E. Intestinal absorption in health and disease--sugars. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003 Dec;17(6):943-56. doi: 10.1016/s1521-6918(03)00107-0.
10) Vulcan A, Manjer J, Ohlsson B. High blood glucose levels are associated with higher risk of colon cancer in men: a cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):842. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3874-4.
11) Yu X, Chen C, Song X, et al. Glycosylated Hemoglobin as an Age-Specific Predictor and Risk Marker of Colorectal Adenomas in Non-Diabetic Adults. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 3;12:774519. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.774519.
12) Lustig RH, Schmidt LA, Brindis CD. Public health: The toxic truth about sugar. Nature. 2012 Feb 1;482(7383):27-9. doi: 10.1038/482027a.
13) Wang YC, Bleich SN, Gortmaker SL. Increasing caloric contribution from sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices among US children and adolescents, 1988-2004. Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1604-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2834.
14) Smirk E, Mazahery H, Conlon CA, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages consumption among New Zealand children aged 8-12 years: a cross sectional study of sources and associates/correlates of consumption. BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 13;21(1):2277. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12345-9.
15) Harris L. Sugar consumption must be reduced throughout life. Br Dent J. 2015 Feb;218(4):215. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.115.
16) Hur J, Otegbeye E, Joh HK, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverage intake in adulthood and adolescence and risk of early-onset colorectal cancer among women. Gut. 2021 Dec;70(12):2330-2336. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323450.
17) Epner M, Yang P, Wagner RW, Cohen L. Understanding the Link between Sugar and Cancer: An Examination of the Preclinical and Clinical Evidence. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 8;14(24):6042. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246042.
18) Yuan C, Joh HK, Wang QL, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverage and sugar consumption and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality according to anatomic subsite. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jun 7;115(6):1481-1489. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac040.
19) Korpela K. Diet, Microbiota, and Metabolic Health: Trade-Off Between Saccharolytic and Proteolytic Fermentation. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2018 Mar 25;9:65-84. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-030117-012830.
20) Johansson ME, Larsson JM, Hansson GC. The two mucus layers of colon are organized by the MUC2 mucin, whereas the outer layer is a legislator of host-microbial interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4659-65. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006451107.
21) Do MH, Lee E, Oh MJ, et al. High-Glucose or -Fructose Diet Cause Changes of the Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Disorders in Mice without Body Weight Change. Nutrients. 2018 Jun 13;10(6):761. doi: 10.3390/nu10060761.
22) Chassaing B, Raja SM, Lewis JD, et al. Colonic Microbiota Encroachment Correlates With Dysglycemia in Humans. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr 13;4(2):205-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.04.001.
23) Thaiss CA, Levy M, Grosheva I, et al. Hyperglycemia drives intestinal barrier dysfunction and risk for enteric infection. Science. 2018 Mar 23;359(6382):1376-1383. doi: 10.1126/science.aar3318.
24) Sundborn G, Gentles D, Metcalf P. Carbonated beverage consumption in New Zealand adults. Pac Health Dialog. 2014 Mar;20(1):87-8.
25) Anderson YC, Wynter LE, Butler MS, et al. Dietary Intake and Eating Behaviours of Obese New Zealand Children and Adolescents Enrolled in a Community-Based Intervention Programme. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 23;11(11):e0166996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166996.
26) Safizadeh F, Mandic M, Pulte D, et al. The underestimated impact of excess body weight on colorectal cancer risk: Evidence from the UK Biobank cohort. Br J Cancer. 2023 Sep;129(5):829-837. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02351-6.
27) Zhang X, Wu K, Giovannucci EL, et al. Early life body fatness and risk of colorectal cancer in u.s. Women and men-results from two large cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Apr;24(4):690-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0909-T.
28) Ministry of Health – Manatū Hauora. Annual Update of Key Results 2018/19: New Zealand Health Survey [Internet]. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health – Manatū Hauora; 2019 Nov 14 [cited 2024 Mar 31]. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/publications/annual-update-of-key-results-201819-new-zealand-health-survey
29) Calcaterra V, Cena H, Magenes VC, et al. Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Metabolic Risk in Children and Adolescents with Obesity: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2023 Jan 30;15(3):702. doi: 10.3390/nu15030702.
Sign in to view your account and access
the latest publications by the NZMJ.
Don't have an account?
Let's get started with creating an account.
Already have an account?
Become a member to enjoy unlimited digital access and support the ongoing publication of the New Zealand Medical Journal.
The New Zealand Medical Journal is fully available to individual subscribers and does not incur a subscription fee. This applies to both New Zealand and international subscribers. Institutions are encouraged to subscribe. The value of institutional subscriptions is essential to the NZMJ, as supporting a reputable medical journal demonstrates an institution’s commitment to academic excellence and professional development. By continuing to pay for a subscription, institutions signal their support for valuable medical research and contribute to the journal's continued success.
Please email us at nzmj@pmagroup.co.nz