ARTICLE

Vol. 139 No. 1637 |

Comorbidities and outcomes in trauma admissions of all severities: a retrospective study

Citation: Christey G, Soysa I, Moosa S. Comorbidities and outcomes in trauma admissions of all severities: a retrospective study. N Z Med J. 2026 Jun 26;139(1637):61-74. doi: 10.26635/6965.7403.

Traumatic injury remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality around the world. In New Zealand, trauma continues to pose a heavy burden on health services and communities, particularly as demographic ageing and rising chronic-disease prevalence intersect with injury risk.

Full article available to subscribers

Traumatic injury remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality around the world.1 In New Zealand, trauma continues to pose a heavy burden on health services and communities, particularly as demographic ageing and rising chronic-disease prevalence intersect with injury risk.2 The Te Manawa Taki (TMT) regional trauma registry,3 which covers a regional population of a million people, has recently published a 10‑year descriptive analysis (2013–2022) of trauma admissions in its catchment, noting that 92% of admissions were low severity and that the proportion of higher-severity trauma increased over the period.4 This evolving case mix highlights the importance of understanding not only injury patterns but also how patient factors, such as comorbidities, influence in-hospital courses and outcomes. 

Comorbid conditions are increasingly recognised as crucial modifiers of trauma outcomes. The recent scoping review by Glynn et al.5 emphasised that major-trauma patients with pre-existing comorbidities consistently face complications, longer stays and higher mortality. Globally, studies have linked chronic diseases such as diabetes, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease and chronic pulmonary disease to elevated risks of acute complications, including sepsis, acute kidney injury (AKI) and hospital-acquired pneumonia.6,7 Moreover, registry-based prediction work has begun to integrate comorbidity metrics to improve the risk adjustments that reflect a broader trend in trauma quality and safety—acknowledging that “host factors” such as pre-existing conditions are important in determining outcomes. Still, that evidence remains patchy, especially for their role in in-hospital complications, including patients with low-severity injuries, who make up approximately 90% of all trauma admissions.4

A recent publication,8 drawing on the TMT trauma registry of patients with all injury severities, found that the incidence of in-hospital complications can be meaningfully described for the TMT Region and are also generalisable New Zealand–wide, underscoring the feasibility and relevance of the approach. The TMT Region’s population is broadly representative of New Zealand as a whole9,10—with a population of approximately 1 million, representing 20% of the New Zealand population—and displays demographic characteristics reflective of the country for median age (35 vs 38 years) and sex (48 vs 50% male),11 but a higher proportion of Māori (26.5 vs 17.1%).12 That work motivates further enquiry into which comorbidities are most strongly associated with key complications among trauma patients, not only in major injuries but in all injury severities.

Accordingly, this study aims to extend the current evidence by examining the relative prevalence of pre-existing comorbidities and their association with key in-hospital complications in all trauma patients recorded in the TMT trauma registry between 2014 and 2023. The study includes all ages, sexes, ethnicities and injury severities to capture the full spectrum of risk, with the expectation of providing evidence on the most significant comorbidities associated with complications in trauma patients during their journey in the hospital. The findings will support future work to develop risk stratification models for clinical use, helping clinicians anticipate and mitigate preventable complications.

Methods

A retrospective review of data from the TMT trauma registry was conducted. The data include patients of all injury severities, ages, sexes and ethnicities admitted to any TMT hospital over 10 years from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2023.

All trauma patient admission records entered into the TMT trauma registry include a patient’s unique identifier, or National Health Index (NHI) number, as well as facility-specific arrival and discharge dates per admission. Data were extracted from the TMT trauma registry using DI Writer/CollectorTM.13 Consistent with trauma registries internationally, patients were excluded if they sustained periprosthetic or insufficiency fractures; exertional injuries; hanging, drowning or asphyxiation without evidence of external force; poisoning; ingestion of a foreign body; injury as a direct result of pre-existing medical conditions or late effects of injury; or the injury occurred more than 7 days before admission.14,15 Demographic and injury-event information for the trauma registry was gathered from prehospital records, hospital systems and, when necessary, directly from patients. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) is calculated from the sum of the squares of the highest Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) grade score in each of the three most severely injured body regions, producing scores ranging from one to a maximum of 75. An ISS of 75 is considered to have the worst prognosis.16 The TMT trauma registry employs AIS version 2008. In this study, high severity or major trauma were defined as any patient with an ISS of >12, or who died in the hospital, including the emergency department; low severity or non-major trauma were defined as any patient with an ISS less than or equal to 12.17

The New Zealand National Minimum Dataset (NMDS)18 is a national collection of public and private hospital admission and discharge information. Both individual patient-level information and facility-specific admission information are collected and stored in the NMDS. All patient-level records include a NHI number, in common with the TMT trauma registry, and any clinical diagnoses information recorded in the NMDS is also specific to a named hospital admission.3 This allows any pre-existing comorbidities of the patient at the time of admission and hospital-acquired-complications diagnoses coding to be linked to a specific facility and admission-date range for any given patient. For this study, a subset of the NMDS containing all diagnoses for the hospital episodes in the TMT region was obtained from Data Services, Ministry of Health – Manatū Hauora, National Collections, NMDS (hospital events), allowing a complete mapping of TMT trauma registry records with NMDS data and classifying pre-existing comorbidities and complications.

The NMDS records were subsequently merged with trauma patient admission data from the TMT trauma registry across multiple fields, including the patient’s unique NHI identifier, facility name, hospital admission date-time, trauma event admission date-time, pre-existing comorbidities based on the comorbidity onset date–field and complication episode date–field elements. All patients were de-identified before analysis. International Classification of Diseases (Tenth Revision, Australian Modification; ICD-10-AM) entries, reflected in both the NMDS dataset provided and those initially entered by hospital-based clinical coders, were used to confirm the accuracy of dataset merging. A select subset of ICD-10-AM codes and groupings, provided by the Australia and New Zealand Trauma Registry (ANZTR), was used for classifying comorbidities and complications (see Appendix Table 1 and Appendix Table 2)19 and pre-existing comorbidities at the time of first presentation to a TMT hospital with injury for trauma care. Additionally, the classification used in the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was applied to the comorbidity data to produce 17 categories.20 The CCI score was calculated by applying weights to each comorbidity category with hierarchy conditions and age-weights (see Appendix Table 3 for more details on the weight scores applied).21–23

Variables examined include patient-demographic characteristics; age, grouped into life stages of 0–14, 15–64 and 65 years and older; sex, classified into female and male; and ethnicity, classified into Māori and non-Māori. To verify differences between in-hospital comorbidities and categorical variables such as sex and ethnicity a Chi-squared test was used, and the Student’s t-Test was used for continuous variables such as age and CCI. Prevalence and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) corrected for demographic characteristics such as ethnicity, sex and age group were used to produce adjusted rate ratios (aRRs). The aRR were calculated with a negative log-binomial regression24 using 10-year mean events in the TMT trauma cohort as offset. To examine the association between the comorbidity categories and complications, correlation statistics were produced using a generalised linear model of logistic regression.25 In all tests, the significance level was set at p<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio version 2025.05.1,26 using packages tidyverse27 and epitools28 with corrplot29 for plotting the correlogram.

As administrative de-identified data were used, ethical approval was deemed out of scope by the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee, and research approval was provided under the locality authorisation process at Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waikato (RD024081).

Results

Over the period 2014–2023, there were a total of 56,113 trauma events and 7,818 cases with a pre-existing comorbidity, accounting for an average of 13.9% of all trauma admissions in the TMT Region over this period.

Among those who were injured, significant differences were observed with respect to the presence of pre-existing comorbidities across injury severity and demographic groups (Table 1). As more than 90% of the injuries were non-major, this is reflected in the sub-group with any comorbidities. However, pre-existing comorbidities were more common among those with major injuries than non-major injuries. Specifically, 791 of 4,405 major-injury patients (18.0%) had pre-existing comorbidities compared with 7,027 of 51,708 non-major-injury patients (13.6%). Pre-existing comorbidities were more prevalent among non-Māori. Specifically, 5,910 of 38,665 non-Māori (15.3%) had at least one comorbidity compared with 1,908 of 17,448 Māori (10.9%). Among those with any comorbidities, 75.6% were non-Māori and 24.4% were Māori. There were more females with a pre-existing comorbidity (4,117 out of 17,448 [19.4%] of the injured females and 52.7% of those with any comorbidity) compared with males (5,910 out of 38,665 [10.6%] of the injured males and 47.3% of those with any comorbidity). Most trauma admissions involving comorbidities occurred in the older age group, 65+ years (59.5% of those with a pre-existing comorbidity), and 4,649 out of 11,197 accounted for 41.5% of the age group 65+.

View Table 1–3, Figure 1–2.

Among individuals with pre-existing comorbidities, the mean of CCI was 4.7 (SD=2.4). The mean CCI was higher among non-Māori compared with Māori (5.1 [SD=2.3] versus 3.5 [SD=2.4], p<0.001), and among females compared with males (5.0 [SD=2.3] versus 4.4 [SD=2.5], p<0.001). Mean CCI increased with age, with the highest scores observed in those aged 65+ years (5.9 [SD=1.9]), followed by 2.8 (SD=1.7) for those aged 15–64 and 1.2 (SD=0.6) and lowest for 0–14 year olds (F=2,687, p<0.001).

The incidence of pre-existing comorbidities in injured patients (median age of 35 years [IQR 17–59]) has steadily increased since 2014 (Figure 1). Similarly, the incidence of complications among trauma admissions has gradually increased over this period.

The aRR show that patients of non-Māori ethnicities, females and those 65 years and older are at higher risk (p<0.001) of having a comorbidity and a complication during their admission (Table 2). For those injured patients with pre-existing comorbidities, people 65 years and above have a higher risk of complications.

Among the sub-group with any comorbidities, diabetes (including type 1 and 2) is the most commonly observed (27.4% without or with complications), followed by cerebrovascular diseases (12.5%) and chronic pulmonary diseases (12.4%) (Table 3). The distribution of specific comorbidity conditions among major-injury and non-major-injury severities were not significantly different for most conditions. Significant differences were seen only in diabetes with chronic complications (p<0.05) and chronic pulmonary diseases (p<0.01), with a higher proportion among the non-major-injury group.

Several comorbidities show significant correlations with in-hospital complications in trauma patients (Figure 2). Diabetes, with or without chronic complications, is associated with AKI (p<0.05). Diabetes with chronic complications, however, is linked to other complications such as cardiac arrest, catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI), central line–associated bloodstream infections, coagulopathy and surgical-site infections (p<0.05).

Cerebrovascular disease is associated with several complications, including AKI, catheter-associated UTI, coagulopathy and post-haemorrhagic anaemia (p<0.05). Chronic pulmonary diseases are linked to acute respiratory distress syndrome and central line–associated bloodstream infections (p<0.05). Chronic kidney disease is associated with various in-hospital complications, such as AKI, catheter-associated UTI, central line–associated bloodstream infections, coagulopathy, sepsis, pneumonia and flap/graft failure (p<0.05). Similarly, peripheral vascular disease is associated with several complications, including AKI, central line–associated bloodstream infections, coagulopathy, pneumonia and graft failure (p<0.05). The generalised linear model statistics with a log link function indicate a significant relationship between age-weighted CCI score and the occurrence of complications (F[428]=0.22, p<0.001).

Discussion

This study profiles comorbidities in trauma admissions from a population of approximately 1 million people in New Zealand. The pre-existing morbidity patterns of injured patients reflect broader morbidity and public health trends in New Zealand, with diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease and cerebrovascular disease being the most common pre-existing conditions.30 This pattern aligns with national and international evidence. The age-standardised prevalence of diabetes rose from 36.6 per 1,000 in 2013 to 47.0 per 1,000 in 2024.31 Further projections suggest that the number of people living with diabetes in New Zealand will nearly double by 2044.32 These findings help to explain why “diabetes without chronic complications” often appears as the leading comorbidity in injury populations.5

The demographic variations observed, such as higher rates of comorbidities among older age groups and females, reflect known health inequities. Age-group patterns in this study align with New Zealand health statistics: in children (0–14 years), chronic pulmonary disease predominantly influences morbidity; among older adults (65+), both cerebrovascular disease and malignancies are leading causes of morbidity, consistent with international literature.33–35 However, the differences by ethnicity in the trauma cohort are not consistent with existing studies and need further exploration. In their “inequity of morbidity” study, Gurney et al.36 showed that Māori and Pacific peoples carry a disproportionately high burden of many common chronic diseases, often at younger ages, compared with non-Māori/non-Pacific groups.

This study reinforces and expands on growing national and international evidence that some of the pre-existing comorbidities are strong predictors of in-hospital complications in trauma patients. Within the TMT cohort from 2014 to 2023, patients with pre-existing comorbidities at admission had markedly higher risks of complications such as AKI, catheter-associated UTI and pneumonia, compared with those without comorbidities, consistent with prior New Zealand and global evidence.5,8 Complications such as AKI, coagulopathy, pneumonia and central line–associated bloodstream infections are notably linked with several comorbidities. In addition to diabetes, chronic pulmonary diseases and cerebrovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease and peripheral vascular diseases are also associated with complications. Because we included the entire trauma population across all severities and ages, our findings emphasise that the influence of comorbidity is not limited to major-trauma cases but extends across the full spectrum of injury. The presence of multiple comorbidities, indicated by a higher CCI score, correlates with an increased likelihood of several complications in trauma patients.

Importantly, our results dovetail with recent region-specific work: the analysis of TMT in-hospital complications8 indicates that complication incidence is measurable at scale in New Zealand trauma cohorts. This study further showcases the possibilities for other regions of New Zealand to integrate their trauma data with other hospital data systems to identify risk predictors for trauma patients. By linking specific comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, renal disease) to discrete complication types (such as central line–associated bloodstream infections, coagulopathy, sepsis, pneumonia, AKI), the regional evidence base can move beyond simple comorbidity counts toward complication-specific risk profiling. However, future studies are needed to achieve this, as this study has limitations. This study did not examine the mediating and moderating role of age in comorbidities and duration of the pre-existing comorbidity, which could have affected the findings on ethnicity and needs further study. Further, the study used ICD-10 coding to classify complications, which is done post-discharge and limits its applicability in a clinical setting. Further examination of complications using clinical and biochemical variables is needed to enable risk profiling of trauma patients.

From a clinical and systems perspective, these findings suggest that early incorporation of comorbidity assessment in trauma pathways is essential, as is early referral to appropriate speciality services in trauma centres. Deploying comorbidity and frailty indices at admission, combined with injury severity and demographic data, can enhance the precision of risk stratification.37,38 Given the integrated registry infrastructure in the TMT Region and the work being done towards digitising the trauma registry data collection, it is feasible to embed predictive models and real-time decision support into existing workflows. Doing so will link the registry to clinical decision support systems, allowing clinicians to flag high-risk patients immediately, allocate preventive resources (e.g., renal protective strategies, early catheter removal, antimicrobial prophylaxis) and monitor performance against complication rates over time.

Conclusion

By integrating newer evidence, including regional registry-based complication analyses and international scoping reviews, this study both confirms known associations and advances locally calibrated risk insight for the New Zealand trauma system. The next steps should include validating model performance, assessing prospective implementation and iteratively refining algorithms with incoming registry data. Over time, embedding this predictive capacity into the trauma care pathway may reduce preventable complication burden and improve patient outcomes.

View Appendix.

Aim

This study examines the relative prevalence of pre-existing comorbidities and their relationship with key in-hospital complications across all injury severities of a trauma patient cohort in New Zealand.

Methods

A retrospective review of data from the Te Manawa Taki (TMT) trauma registry linked to the National Minimum Dataset in New Zealand was conducted. The linked data include patients of all injury severities over 10 years, from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2023, and pre-existing comorbidities and complications associated with admission events across facilities. Comorbidities and complications were defined using the Australia and New Zealand Trauma Registry classification.

Results

Between 2014 and 2023, 13% of trauma admissions in the TMT Region involved patients with pre-existing comorbidities, with a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 4.7 (SD=2.4). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) show that patients of non-Māori ethnicities (1.4), females (1.8) and those aged 65 and over (4.8) are more likely (p<0.001) to have a comorbidity. Diabetes is the most common pre-existing comorbidity, followed by chronic pulmonary diseases and cerebrovascular diseases. Findings demonstrate that individuals aged 65 and over with comorbidities face a 2.2 times higher risk of in-hospital complications (p<0.001). Regression analysis indicates that having multiple comorbidities, reflected by higher CCI scores, increases the likelihood of complications in trauma patients (F[428]=0.22, p<0.001).

Conclusion

From a clinical and systems perspective, these findings suggest that early incorporation of comorbidity assessment in trauma pathways is essential and should be applied across the full spectrum of injury severities.

Authors

Prof Grant Christey, MBChB, FRACS, FACS: Clinical Director, Te Manawa Taki (Midland) Trauma System, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waikato; Waikato Clinical School, The University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Ishani Soysa, BSc, MSc, PhD: Research Manager, Te Manawa Taki (Midland) Trauma System, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Sheena Moosa, MBBS, MPH, PhD: Research Fellow, Te Manawa Taki (Midland) Trauma System, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Correspondence

Prof Grant Christey, MBChB, FRACS, FACS: Clinical Director, Te Manawa Taki (Midland) Trauma System, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waikato, 183 Pembroke Street, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton 3204, New Zealand.

Correspondence email

grant.christey@waikatodhb.health.nz

Competing interests

Nil.

1)       World Health Organization. Injuries and violence [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: 2024 Jun 19 [cited 2025 Sep 24]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/injuries-and-violence

2)       National Trauma Network. Annual Report 2021/22 [Internet]. Wellington, New Zealand: Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora; 2023 Jan [cited 2025 Sep 14]. Available from: https://static.info.content.health.nz/docs/About%20us/Trauma%20networks/National-Trauma-Network-annual-report-2022.pdf

3)       Te Manawa Taki Trauma System. Trauma Registry [Internet]. Hamilton, New Zealand: 2020 [cited 2025 May 20].

4)       Christey G, Soysa I, Smith A. Characteristics of low, moderate and high severity trauma hospitalisations in a health region of Aotearoa New Zealand-10-year review. N Z Med J. 2024 Jul 19;137(1599):37-48. doi: 10.26635/6965.6428.

5)       Glynn R, Edwards F, Wullschleger M, et al. Major trauma and comorbidity: a scoping review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 12;51(1):133. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02805-x.

6)       Harrois A, Soyer B, Gauss T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for acute kidney injury among trauma patients: a multicenter cohort study. Crit Care. 2018 Dec 18;22(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2265-9.

7)       Tian-Yang Yu A, Gnaedinger A, Grisel B, et al. A Multifactorial Analysis of Trauma Outcomes: Comorbidities, Race, and Socioeconomic Status. J Surg Res. 2024 Dec;304:41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.075.

8)       Moosa S, Smith A, Soysa I, Christey G. In-hospital complications among trauma admissions in a health region of New Zealand. Trauma. 2025 Jun;27(3). doi: 10.1177/14604086251343659.

9)       Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa. Customised 2018 Census-based population estimates and projections from the 2024 Annual Update according to assumptions agreed to by Health New Zealand. 2025.

10)    Simpkins C, Soysa IB, Christey G. Falls at home: hospital admissions in a health region of Aotearoa New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2024 Jan 19;137(1588):47-56. doi: 10.26635/6965.6264.

11)    Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa. Subnational population estimates: At 30 June 2023 [Internet]. Wellington, New Zealand: 2023 Oct 25 [cited 2025 May 20]. Available from: https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/subnational-population-estimates-at-30-june-2023/

12)    Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa. Māori population estimates: At 30 June 2021 [Internet]. Wellington, New Zealand: 2021 Nov 16 [cited 2025 Jun 13]. Available from: https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/maori-population-estimates-at-30-june-2021/

13)    Digital Innovation Incorporated. DI Report Writer. For DI Trauma Registry Systems Storing XML Data. 2018.

14)    Nwomeh BC, Lowell W, Kable R, et al. History and development of trauma registry: lessons from developed to developing countries. World J Emerg Surg. 2006 Oct 31;1:32. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-1-32.

15)    Te Manawa Taki Trauma System. Annual Report 2023 [Internet]. Hamilton, New Zealand: 2024 [cited 2025 May 20].

16)    Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Abbreviated Injury Scale [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2026 Jun 8]. Available from: https://www.aisinjuryscale.org/ais-products/ais-products-list

17)    Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora. New Zealand Trauma Registry: National minimum dataset for trauma [Internet]. Welington, New Zealand: 2026 Apr 17 [cited 2025 Sep 18]. Available from: https://www.majortrauma.nz/nz-mtr/national-minimum-data-set-for-trauma/

18)    Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora. National Minimum Dataset. File Specification for File Version 015.0 [Internet]. Wellington, New Zealand: 2025 Jul [cited 2025 May 20]. Available from: https://static.info.content.health.nz/docs/about-us/health-data/File%20specifications/nmds-file-specification-for-file-version-015.0-v16.3-july-2025.pdf

19)    Australia New Zealand Trauma Registry. Bi-National Trauma Minimum Dataset (BNTMDS) Australia and New Zealand: Core Data Items Data Dictionary (Version 2.1) [Internet]. Melbourne, Australia: 2024 Aug [cited 2025 Sep 18]. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b761ed3f93fd491065f7839/t/6785f09115c4bc0625a32e29/1736831130179/ANZTR_BNTMDS_Data+Dictionary_V2.1_FINAL.pdf

20)    Charlson ME, Carrozzino D, Guidi J, Patierno C. Charlson Comorbidity Index: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties. Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(1):8-35. doi: 10.1159/000521288.

21)    Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar 15;173(6):676-682. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq433.

22)    Perkins GD, Hawkes CA, Eli K, et al. Recommended summary plan for emergency care and treatment: ReSPECT a mixed-methods study. Health and Social Care Delivery Research. 2022 Dec;10(40): 1-140. doi: 10.3310/LFPE3627.

23)    Glasheen WP, Cordier T, Gumpina R, et al. Charlson Comorbidity Index: ICD-9 Update and ICD-10 Translation. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2019 Jun-Jul;12(4):188-197.

24)    Ibáñez-Pinilla M, Villalba-Niño S, Olaya-Galán NN. Negative log-binomial model with optimal robust variance to estimate the prevalence ratio, in cross-sectional population studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 4;23(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01999-1.

25)    Fox J. Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. 3rd ed. Sage Publications; 2015.

26)    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021 [cited 2026 May 14]. Available from: https://www.R-project.org

27)    Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W. Welcome to the Tidyverse. The Journal of Open Source Software. 2019 Nov;4(43):1686. doi: 10.21105/joss.01686.

28)    Aragon TJ, Fay MP, Wollschlaeger D, et al. epitools: Epidemiology Tools [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017 [cited 2026 Mar 12]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=epitools

29)    Wei T, Simko V. Corrplot [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024 [cited 2025 Oct 2]. Available from: https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot

30)    Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora. National-level long-term health conditions work programme [Internet]. Wellington, New Zealand: 2024 [cited 2025 Oct 2]. Available from: https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/for-health-professionals/clinical-guidance/diseases-and-conditions/long-term-conditions/about-chronic-health-conditions

31)    Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora. Virtual Diabetes Register web tool [Internet]. Wellington, New Zealand: 2025 [cited 2025 Oct 2]. Available from: https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/for-health-professionals/data-and-statistics/diabetes/virtual-diabetes-register-web-tool

32)    Teng A, Stanley J, Krebs J, et al. Projected increases in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2020-2044. N Z Med J. 2025 Jan 24;138(1608):94-106. doi: 10.26635/6965.6500.

33)    Nicholson K, Liu W, Fitzpatrick D, et al. Prevalence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy among adults and older adults: a systematic review. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024 Apr;5(4):e287-e296. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00007-2.

34)    Wong WJ, Nguyen T, Fortin M, Harrison C. Prevalence and patterns of comorbidities in older people with type 2 diabetes in Australian primary care settings. Australas J Ageing. 2024 Jun;43(2):306-313. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13282.

35)    Berggren M, Stenvall M, Englund U, et al. Co-morbidities, complications and causes of death among people with femoral neck fracture - a three-year follow-up study. BMC Geriatr. 2016 Jun 3;16:120. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0291-5.

36)    Gurney J, Stanley J, Sarfati D. The inequity of morbidity: Disparities in the prevalence of morbidity between ethnic groups in New Zealand. J Comorb. 2020 Nov 10;10:2235042X20971168. doi: 10.1177/2235042X20971168.

37)    Joseph B, Pandit V, Zangbar B, et al. Superiority of frailty over age in predicting outcomes among geriatric trauma patients: a prospective analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014 Aug;149(8):766-772. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.296.

38)    Earnest A, Palmer C, O'Reilly G, et al. Development and validation of a risk-adjustment model for mortality and hospital length of stay for trauma patients: a prospective registry-based study in Australia. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 23;11(8):e050795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050795.