The tibialis posterior tendon (TPT) wraps posteriorly around the medial malleolus within the retromalleolar groove of the distal tibia, beneath the medial flexor retinaculum. This anatomy permits the TPT to act as a powerful supinator and flexor of the ankle while supporting the medial plantar arch. Ankle fractures can be complicated by TPT injuries.
Full article available to subscribers
The tibialis posterior tendon (TPT) wraps posteriorly around the medial malleolus within the retromalleolar groove of the distal tibia, beneath the medial flexor retinaculum.1 This anatomy permits the TPT to act as a powerful supinator and flexor of the ankle while supporting the medial plantar arch. Ankle fractures can be complicated by TPT injuries. Numerous case reports exist detailing acute post-traumatic incarceration of the TPT in the tibiofibular space or within fracture fragments; however, delayed entrapment secondary to osseous changes is much less commonly reported.2–4 We identified only two other case reports describing the delayed post-traumatic formation of an osseous tunnel or groove causing entrapment and irritation of the TPT at 1 year and 10 years post-injury respectively.5,6 Both cases had injuries initially managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), although neither case used a posteromedial approach, which appears to be unique to our case.
A 39-year-old female presented at 3 months post-operatively with clinical symptoms of TPT irritation including posteromedial ankle pain, swelling and weakness of inversion. She had undergone an ORIF of a closed Maisonneuve-type fracture-dislocation injury with a comminuted posterior malleolar fragment and high fibula fracture, sustained after a skateboard fall in October 2024. Initial fixation on day 1 post-injury used a modified posteromedial approach exploiting the interval between flexor hallucis longus and the tibial nerve. Medial and lateral posterior tibial plates were applied with additional syndesmotic fixation. The patient was kept non–weight bearing for 6 weeks, transitioning from cast to moon boot at 2 weeks to allow early motion.
Subsequent imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) demonstrated TPT entrapment in a tight osseous tunnel, measuring 8mm by 10mm in width and 27mm in length, at the original posterior malleolar fracture site, with associated tendinopathy.
View Figure 1–3.
At 6 months post-surgery, the patient then proceeded to undergo removal of metalware and liberation of the incarcerated TPT using a novel technique to prevent recurrent entrapment. Using the prior posteromedial approach, the osseous tunnel and entrapped tendon were directly visualised. The tendon was mobilised, minor tears were repaired and surrounding bony surfaces were prepared. A fibula allograft, shaped to fill the defect, was placed and fixed with Acutrak screws. Upon seating of the screws, the graft split; however, it remained well fixed and was therefore accepted. Demineralised bone matrix putty was placed around the graft. Bony prominences were burred and a GENTA-FOIL resorb collagen wrap was secured around the tendon. The TPT was visualised to be gliding freely prior to closure. The patient was casted for wound healing initially, with early range of motion encouraged from 2 weeks post-operatively to prevent adhesions.
Follow-up ultrasounds at 2 and 3 months have shown improving dynamic gliding of the TPT with progressive graft integration. Clinically, reported patient symptoms include improved pain, tendon excursion and function, although some residual posteromedial swelling remains.
This rare case report emphasises the importance of considering delayed soft tissue complications secondary to posteromedial ankle fractures despite initial reassurance from direct visualisation of soft tissues at the time of open reduction. In this instance, multiple imaging modalities proved helpful to identify the development of an osseous tunnel with incarceration of the TPT. The intact TPT was able to be liberated and the osseous deformity corrected to prevent further future complications.
Dr Savannah Adams: Orthopaedic Registrar, Department of Orthopaedics, Christchurch Public Hospital, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch.
Dr Nikki Hooper: Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, Christchurch Public Hospital, Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch.
Tim Chuang: Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, Christchurch Public Hospital, Health
New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch.
Dr Savannah Adams: Department of Orthopaedics, Christchurch Public Hospital, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch.
Nil.
1) Lhoste-Trouilloud A. The tibialis posterior tendon. J Ultrasound. 2012 Feb;15(1):2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jus.2012.02.001.
2) Fantry A, Lareau C, Vopat B, Blankenhorn B. Tibialis Posterior Tendon Entrapment Within Posterior Malleolar Fracture Fragment. Am J Orthop. 2016;45(3):E103–E107.
3) Aamir J, Syziu A, Andritsos L, et al. Tibialis posterior tendon entrapment in posterior malleolar and pilon injuries of the ankle: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Feb;34(2):781-787. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03714-8.
4) Syziu A, Aamir J, Mason LW. Posterior tibialis tendon entrapment as a complication of posterior malleolar fractures in complex ankle fractures. Bone Jt Open. 2024 Mar 28;5(3):252-259. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0139.
5) Hikichi T, Matsubara H, Shimokawa K, et al. Equinus foot deformity and malunion of the medial malleolus caused by tibialis posterior tendon interposition following irreducible fracture dislocation of the ankle: A case report and literature review. Trauma Case Rep. 2022;38:100618. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2022.100618.
6) Amouyel T, Benazech B, Saab M, et al. An unexpected complication of nonoperative treatment for tibial posterior malleolus fracture: bony entrapment of tibialis posterior tendon - a case report. Acta Orthop. 2019 Aug 12;90(6):624-625. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1652972.
Sign in to view your account and access
the latest publications by the NZMJ.
Don't have an account?
Let's get started with creating an account.
Already have an account?
Become a member to enjoy unlimited digital access and support the ongoing publication of the New Zealand Medical Journal.
The New Zealand Medical Journal is fully available to individual subscribers and does not incur a subscription fee. This applies to both New Zealand and international subscribers. Institutions are encouraged to subscribe. The value of institutional subscriptions is essential to the NZMJ, as supporting a reputable medical journal demonstrates an institution’s commitment to academic excellence and professional development. By continuing to pay for a subscription, institutions signal their support for valuable medical research and contribute to the journal's continued success.
Please email us at nzmj@pmagroup.co.nz